Criteria for eligibility to cisplatin in the curative treatment of head and neck cancer: Consensus opinion from a panel of experts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.08.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is an important problem in Brazil, where epidemiological and socioeconomic features often create barriers to the implementation of combined modalities with curative potential. Cisplatin improves the efficacy of radiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of localized SCCHN and in the definitive therapy of locally advanced disease. However, the addition of high-dose cisplatin to radiotherapy increases treatment toxicity and is not always warranted. A panel of experts convened in Sao Paulo, Brazil, for discussions and recommendations regarding the use of high-dose cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy in SCCHN. In addition to discussing their professional experience, panel members used the current literature to provide evidence-based, practical recommendations regarding sociodemographic or medical criteria that may preclude safe administration of cisplatin. It is hoped that the application of these recommendations in clinical practice may improve therapeutic results in Brazil and other countries with similar health-care environments.

Introduction

With nearly 700 thousand new cases and400 thousand deaths per year, squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is more frequent in developing countries, and currently accounts for 5% of malignancies worldwide (Ferlay et al., 2015). Central and South America are characterized by high incidence rates for head and neck cancer (Perdomo et al., 2016). Such rates are especially high in Brazil, where oral cavity and larynx tumors combined represent the second most frequent tumor type among men, with slightly larger number of estimated new cases every year than lung cancer (Brasil. Ministério da saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer, 2018). Although scientific advances in SCCHN have been slower than those observed in other subspecialties of oncology, multidisciplinary management, organ preservation, the recognition of the biologic diversity of different types of SCCHN, and the advent of effective systemic therapies have all brought incremental improvements over the past two decades (Rischin et al., 2015). Moreover, the recognition of the role of chemotherapy, especially high-dose cisplatin, as an adjunct to radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with resectable and locally advanced disease has been an important milestone in SCCHN (Pignon et al., 2009). However, the addition of high-dose cisplatin to radiotherapy increases treatment toxicity and may not be warranted in some patients, and it has been suggested that only about half of the patients are able to receive the planned three cycles of high-dose cisplatin (Bernier et al., 2004). In addition to acute toxicity, such as nausea, vomiting, renal dysfunction, myelosuppression, transaminase and bilirubin elevation, hypersensitivity reactions and other less frequent events, the risk of long-term complications from the use of high-dose cisplatin should always be borne in mind. Such late toxicities are usually seen in patients treated with chemoradiation protocols, and include dysphagia, xerostomia, hypothyroidism, ototoxicity, and osteoradionecrosis (Rivelli et al., 2015).

Brazil is a country where socioeconomic features often create barriers to the widespread implementation of combined modalities with curative potential (Sanabria et al., 2010). Moreover, there is insufficient local data that may inform decisions about individual treatment modalities, especially systemic therapy (de Castro et al., 2007). Thus, in March 2017 a panel of experts convened in Sao Paulo, Brazil, to discuss and provide recommendations regarding the safe use of high-dose cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy in oral cavity, oro- and hypopharynx, and larynx squamous-cell carcinomas, here named as SCCHN. The results of that panel, presented in this paper, aim at informing health-care providers caring for patients with SCCHN in Brazil and in other countries with similar socioeconomic environments.

Section snippets

Panel composition and scope

The expert panel consisted of 10 invited members and one moderator, all of which involved on a daily basis in the management of patients with SCCHN. Members consisted of nine medical oncologists and one head and neck surgeon, all from Brazil. Such individuals practice in five of the 27 federated units from Brazil, which are home to nearly 53% of the current Brazilian population (Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 2018). The expert discussions were moderated by one

Initial assessment

An overarching principle shared by panel members is that treatment decisions should be individualized and based on the collective assessment of all elements displayed in Table 1. Ideally, patients with SCCHN should be managed by a multidisciplinary team that involves at least a head and neck surgeon, a radiation oncologist, and a medical oncologist. Close communication among these specialists is of paramount importance and cannot be overemphasized. Furthermore, it is desirable that a

Discussion

The benefit-risk ratio from the use of high-dose cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy can only be optimized if eligible patients are carefully selected. The selection criteria utilized in clinical trials are typically more stringent than the factors considered in clinical practice, where variability in patient characteristics often goes beyond biological issues to include important socioeconomic factors. Moreover, practice-changing clinical trials in SCCHN have usually been conducted in

Conflict of interest statement

GCJ has served as a consultant or an advisor for Merck Serono and received travel financial support from Merck Serono to attend scientific meetings.

GVA has served as a speaker for AstraZeneca and Roche, received grants for advisory boards from Roche, Merck-Seromo and MSD, and research grants from Roche, MSD, Bristol, Merck-Seromo, Pfizer and Centus.

AFC has served as a consultant or an advisor in exchange for honoraria and received research funding from Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers

Acknowledgements

The panel of experts was sponsored by Merck Brazil. Medical writing assistance for this publication was provided by DENDRIX and funded by Merck Brazil. All authors contributed to the writing and revision of this manuscript and read and approved the final version for submission.

References (42)

  • J.P. Pignon et al.

    Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients

    Radiother. Oncol.

    (2009)
  • M. Sandoval et al.

    The role of vegetable and fruit consumption and other habits on survival following the diagnosis of oral cancer: a prospective study in Spain

    Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.

    (2009)
  • K.N. Syrigos et al.

    Head and neck cancer in the elderly: an overview on the treatment modalities

    Cancer Treat. Rev.

    (2009)
  • D.J. Adelstein et al.

    An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2003)
  • J.P. Agarwal et al.

    Cetuximab with radiotherapy in patients with loco-regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck unsuitable or ineligible for concurrent platinum-based chemo-radiotherapy: ready for routine clinical practice?

    Indian J. Cancer

    (2011)
  • Brasil. Ministério da saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Estimativa 2016:Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Disponível...
  • Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Projeção da população do Brasil e das Unidades da Federação....
  • J. Bernier et al.

    Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2004)
  • J.A. Bonner et al.

    Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2006)
  • E.E. Cohen et al.

    Phase III randomized trial of induction chemotherapy in patients with N2 or N3 locally advanced head and neck cancer

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2014)
  • J.S. Cooper et al.

    Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Cetuximab and Radiation Therapy Versus Cisplatin and Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Long-Term Survival and Toxicity Outcomes of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

      2020, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      RT plus concurrent CDDP is currently the standard treatment for LASCCHN.9,10 With the publication of the trial conducted by Bonner et al in 2006,1 and their secondary 5-year survival analysis in 2010,2 many authors started to consider substituting the relatively toxic CDDP-based radiochemotherapy (RCT) with the addition of RT of the promising epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor CTX.11-13 To our knowledge, robust data on this comparison were lacking until the publication of the results of the RTOG-10165 and the De-ESCALaTE HPV trials.6

    • Recent advances in ruthenium and platinum based supramolecular coordination complexes for antitumor therapy

      2019, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
      Citation Excerpt :

      Except for cisplatin, carbonplatin, nedeaplatin, oxaliplatin, lobaplatin and heptaplatin (Fig. 1a) were fabricated and have been approved for clinical use [14]. This cisplatin and their derivatives had been proved to show good treatment efficacy against the majority of cancers such as breast, lung, ovaries, stomach, thyroid, multiple myeloma, soft tissue sarcoma, and others [15–19]. However, there are some limitations for the cisplatin and their derivatives [18,20–22] such as low tumor targeting, poor water solubility, fast renal clearance, and high toxicity to live cells, which had embedded their wider clinical applications [23].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text