Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 112-126, November 2010

Diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder: The state of the art

  • Sean R. Williamson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • ,
  • Rodolfo Montironi

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region (Ancona), United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
  • ,
  • Antonio Lopez-Beltran

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Cordoba University, Cordoba, Spain
  • ,
  • Gregory T. MacLennan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Darrell D. Davidson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • ,
  • Liang Cheng

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
    • Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Indiana University School of Medicine, 350 West 11th Street, CPL 4010, Indianapolis 46202, IN, USA. Tel.: +1 317 491 6442; fax: +1 317 491 6419.

Accepted 7 January 2010. published online 25 January 2010.

Abstract 

Urothelial carcinoma in situ (CIS) is regarded as a precursor of invasive bladder carcinoma. Although relatively uncommon as a primary entity, CIS is frequently seen in conjunction with other bladder tumors and represents a significant source of difficulty for surveillance of patients with known bladder cancer. CIS lesions are difficult to detect by cystoscopic examination or by currently available screening markers. Urothelial CIS is infrequently reported in the literature as a primary process; however, a wide variety of emerging methodologies are becoming available for screening and follow-up of bladder cancer. Most new methods demonstrate sensitivity and specificity similar to the current standard of urine cytology and cystoscopy. Detection of high-grade lesions such as CIS by these methods appears generally better than detection of low-grade lesions. Current molecular evidence suggests that a spectrum of genetic aberrations including p53 mutations are strongly associated with the potentially invasive CIS phenotype in contrast to low-grade papillary and hyperplastic lesions. These low-grade lesions frequently recur but infrequently become invasive. Patients with high-grade lesions including CIS and high-grade papillary tumors warrant aggressive treatment and life-long surveillance.

Keywords: Bladder, Urothelial carcinoma in situ, Urothelial dysplasia, Molecular pathogenesis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1040-8428(10)00006-5

doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.01.005

Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 112-126, November 2010