Volume 74, Issue 3 , Pages 203-210, June 2010
Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis vs. current practice neutropenia management in elderly breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Abstract
We investigated the incidences of febrile neutropenia (FN) and related complications in elderly (≥65 years) breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy supported by pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis (PP; n
=
150) or current practice (CP) neutropenia management (n
=
104) in a subanalysis of NeuCuP (Neulasta® vs. current practice neutropenia management). Studies involving regimens with moderately high to high (≥15%) FN risk were identified by literature review, and individual patient data were integrated for analysis. FN incidence was 6% (95% CI: 2, 10%) in the PP group and 24% (95% CI: 16, 32%) in the CP group. In cycle 1, incidences were 3 and 15%, respectively. FN-related hospitalisation incidence was 5% (PP group) and 15% (CP group), while dose reductions (≥15%) occurred in 15 and 29% of patients. Pegfilgrastim provided effective PP in elderly patients, a population who may be vulnerable to chemotherapy-related FN and for whom current practice may not provide adequate protection.
Keywords: Breast cancer, Chemotherapy, Elderly, Febrile neutropenia, G-CSF, Pegfilgrastim, Primary prophylaxis
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S1040-8428(09)00124-3
doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.06.004
© 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Volume 74, Issue 3 , Pages 203-210, June 2010
