Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology
Volume 74, Issue 2 , Pages 97-105, May 2010

Six independent domains are defined by geriatric assessment in elderly cancer patients

  • R. Stauder

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine V (Haematology and Oncology), Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +43 512 504 23255.
  • ,
  • K. Moser

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine V (Haematology and Oncology), Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
  • ,
  • B. Holzner

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biological Psychiatry, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria
  • ,
  • B. Sperner-Unterweger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biological Psychiatry, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria
  • ,
  • G. Kemmler

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biological Psychiatry, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria

Accepted 29 April 2009. published online 11 June 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Geriatric assessment (GA) must be integrated into treatment concepts for elderly cancer patients. Aim of this study was to assess the coverage of a large battery of GA instruments by determining the number of independent domains measured.

Methods

Thirteen different GA scores were applied in 78 elderly tumor patients (mean age 72.9 years). Data were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis and substantiated by non-parametric correlation analyses.

Results

Factor analysis yielded a six-factor solution explaining 77.1% of the total variance. The six domains identified may be described as general functioning in everyday life, health-related quality of life, co-morbidities, social support, cognition, and nutritional status. This factor structure was reasonably well confirmed by correlation analyses. Notably, WHO Performance Status, Karnofsky Index, VES-13 and PPT generally revealed high correlations with functional capacities, but only low correlations with comorbidities, social support, cognitive functioning or nutritional status.

Conclusions

From the six domains described a basis for efficient application of GA instruments in elderly cancer patients is worked out. The classical instruments WHO and KI as well as the screening scores VES-13 and PPT, while capturing physical functioning well, fail to cover several other important GA domains.

Keywords: Geriatric, Assessment, Elderly, Cancer, Factor analysis, Screening

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Parts of this manuscript were presented at the 9th Meeting of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology in Montreal, Canada.

PII: S1040-8428(09)00101-2

doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.04.010

Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology
Volume 74, Issue 2 , Pages 97-105, May 2010