Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology
Volume 46, Issue 3 , Pages 235-239, June 2003

Mammography screening in elderly women: efficacy and cost-effectiveness

Descriptive and Epidemiological Unit, Center for Study and Prevention of Cancer (CSPO), Scientific Institute of Tuscany Region, Via di San Salvi, 12, 50135 Florence, Italy

Received 1 April 2002; received in revised form 1 November 2002; accepted 25 November 2002.

Abstract 

The definition of an upper age limit for breast cancer screening is a rather complex issue, influenced by several conditions. Randomised trials specifically designed to investigate this aspect are not available, but all process indicators (positive predictive value, length of sojourn time, sensitivity of the test) indicate that screening efficacy does not change with increasing age. On the other hand, competing causes of death could decrease screening efficacy beyond age 74. Screening benefits depend on life expectancy and people with <5–10 years life expectancy are unlikely to benefit from screening, so it is still worthwhile considering the variability of life expectancy at different ages. Furthermore, economical implications are evident. Public health recommendations need to weigh the benefit of screening elderly women against costs, negative side effects and potential harm due to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of screen-detected lesions expected to have no effect on mortality. In this scenario, the medical system has an ethical obligation to properly inform the population invited to screening. Over the age of 74 years, encouraging individualized decisions may be more appropriate and may indicate further screening for those subjects for whom the potential benefit outweighs the potential negative effects.

Keywords:  Mass screening, Mammography, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Aged, Breast cancer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1040-8428(03)00022-2

doi:10.1016/S1040-8428(03)00022-2

Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology
Volume 46, Issue 3 , Pages 235-239, June 2003