Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology
Volume 43, Issue 2 , Pages 159-165, August 2002

EORTC prostate cancer trials: what have we learnt?

  • Theo M. de Reijke

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31-20-5666004; fax: +31-20-6919647
  • ,
  • Laurence Collette

      Affiliations

    • EORTC Data Center, Statistician, Brussels, Belgium

Accepted 23 October 2001.

Abstract 

The aims of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-GU (EORTC-GU) Group are to improve the treatment of cancer related problems by carrying out multicenter, multinational and intercontinental Phases II and III trials and the dissemination of their results via workshops, congresses and symposia. The first studies in prostate cancer dealt with the use of chemotherapeutic agents in advanced tumours. Mitomycin C was the most active agent identified. We have learnt that the primary tumour should not be used for response assessment in advanced disease but that Quality of life (QoL) assessment consistently applied may be. In later studies QoL and PSA response were considered as the most important endpoints for Phase II trials in this disease. In patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease maximal androgen blockade (MAB), in different forms, has been studied. Conflicting outcomes have been observed, which could be explained by the inclusion of patients with different prognostic factors at entry in the studies. The anti-androgen monotherapy approach in patients with M+ disease with good prognostic factors has been shown to be feasible, side effects using a steroidal agent were higher compared with non-steroidal agents. The hormono-chemotherapy approach in patients with M+ disease and poor prognostic factors at entry showed not to be of any benefit in terms of survival and also QoL was worse in these patients. Patients with locally advanced disease treated with external beam radiation therapy had a significant better survival if this treatment was combined with 3 years of hormonal therapy. The ongoing Phase III study in metastatic prostate cancer is comparing intermittent hormonal therapy and continuous treatment and in locally advanced prostate cancer a Phase III trial is testing the so-called step-up and step-down regimen.

Keywords:  Prostate cancer, Trials, Phase II, Phase III, EORTC-GU Group

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1040-8428(02)00028-8

Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology
Volume 43, Issue 2 , Pages 159-165, August 2002